Abstract
                	Background and Aims The genus 
Fritillaria (Liliaceae)  comprises species with extremely large genomes (1C ¼ 30 000–127 000 Mb) and a  bicontinental distribution. Most North American species (subgenus Liliorhiza)  differ from Eurasian Fritillaria species by their distinct phylogenetic  position and increased amounts of heterochromatin. This study examined the  contribution of major repetitive elements to the genome obesity found in  
Fritillaria and identified repeats contributing to the heterochromatin arrays  in Liliorhiza species.
                    Methods Two 
Fritillaria species of similar genome size were  selected for detailed analysis, one from each phylogeographical clade: 
F.  affinis (1C ¼ 45.6 pg, North America) and 
F. imperialis(1C ¼ 43.0 pg, Eurasia).  Fosmid libraries were constructed from their genomic DNAs and used for  identification, sequence characterization, quantification and chromosome  localization of clones containing highly repeated sequences.
                    Key Results and Conclusions Repeats corresponding to 6.7 and  4.7% of the 
F. affinis and 
F. imperialis genome, respectively, were identified.  Chromoviruses and the Tat lineage of Ty3/gypsy group long terminal repeat  retrotransposons were identified as the predominant components of the highly  repeated fractions in the 
F. affinis and 
F. imperialis genomes, respectively.  In addition, a heterogeneous, extremely AT-rich satellite repeat was isolated  from 
F. affinis. 
                    The FriSAT1 repeat localized in heterochromatic bands makes up  approx. 26% of the 
F. affinis genome and substantial genomic fractions in  several other Liliorhiza species. However, no evidence of a relationship  between heterochromatin content and genome size variation was observed. Also,  this study was unable to reveal any predominant repeats which tracked the  increasing/decreasing trends of genome size evolution in 
Fritillaria. Instead,  the giant Fritillaria genomes seem to be composed of many diversified families  of transposable elements. We hypothesize that the genome obesity may be partly  determined by the failure of removal mechanisms to counterbalance effectively  the retrotransposon amplification.